Skip to content

23 September 2026 · National and international edition

Vande Mataram in the Supreme Court: Can the State Punish Those Who Do Not Sing the National Song?

  • Polity, Constitution & Governance
  • GS-II, GS-I
  • The Hindureported it
  • Vande Mataram
  • Fundamental Rights
  • National Symbols
  • Supreme Court
  • Secularism

Why it is in the news

On 22 September 2026, a three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court — CJI Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V. Mohana — sought the Union government's response to a petition by Carnatic vocalist T.M. Krishna challenging the Prevention of Insults to National Honour (Amendment) Act, 2026 and the Ministry of Home Affairs orders that prescribe all six stanzas of Vande Mataram at official functions. The Bench observed that while the elected State may define the National Song, a conscientious objector who declines to sing it cannot be subjected to penal consequences, and that the law declared in Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala (1986) will govern the 2026 amendment.

The exam angle

Issue: Can a constitutional democracy use the criminal law to secure reverence for a national symbol without infringing freedom of expression and conscience?

Written for APPSC Group 1, TGPSC Group 1 and UPSC Civil Services. More from 23 September 2026 or all current affairs.

Vande Mataram in the Supreme Court: Can the State Punish Those Who Do Not Sing the National Song? · PrepShark